Home Companies RAND.AS Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Randstad N.V.

5 companies structurally similar to Randstad N.V. (RAND.AS) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-04-05 · RAND.AS full analysis →

Companies similar to Randstad N.V. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in valuation. Examples in this group include Adecco Group AG, DKSH Holding AG, Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A..

Reference company
RAND.AS
Randstad N.V.
Peer score: 49
Dimension scores
Growth
61
Quality
14
Valuation
82
Stability
42
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
ADEN.SW · Industrials
46
#2
DKSH.SW · Industrials
49
#3
SGO.PA · Industrials
66
#4
WSO · Industrials
41
#5
KGX.DE · Industrials
33
Direct comparisons — RAND.AS vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Industrials rankings

See how Randstad N.V. ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore RAND.AS peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore RAND.AS peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.