Home Companies MYCR.ST Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Mycronic AB (publ)

12 companies structurally similar to Mycronic AB (publ) (MYCR.ST) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-06-14 · MYCR.ST full analysis →

Companies similar to Mycronic AB (publ) cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in growth. Examples in this group include Howmet Aerospace Inc., Accelleron Industries AG, Crane Company.

Reference company
MYCR.ST
Mycronic AB (publ)
Peer score: 60
Dimension scores
Growth
80
Quality
76
Valuation
37
Stability
51
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
HWM · Industrials
54
#2
ACLN.SW · Industrials
67
#3
CR · Industrials
46
#4
DPLM.L · Industrials
41
#5
ETN · Industrials
36
#6
RR.L · Industrials
70
#7
VRT · Industrials
50
#8
FIX · Industrials
47
#9
GRMN · Technology
51
#10
RAA.DE · Industrials
53
#11
HLMA.L · Industrials
45
#12
WWD · Industrials
62
Direct comparisons — MYCR.ST vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Industrials rankings

See how Mycronic AB (publ) ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore MYCR.ST peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore MYCR.ST peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.