Home Companies MRK Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Merck & Co., Inc.

12 companies structurally similar to Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-04-05 · MRK full analysis →

Companies similar to Merck & Co., Inc. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in valuation. Examples in this group include Exelixis, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Novartis AG.

Reference company
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
Peer score: 63
Dimension scores
Growth
31
Quality
62
Valuation
88
Stability
57
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
EXEL · Healthcare
77
#2
BMY · Healthcare
61
#3
NOVN.SW · Healthcare
55
#4
ILMN · Healthcare
59
#5
AZN · Healthcare
52
#6
AZN.L · Healthcare
49
#7
ALK-B.CO · Healthcare
55
#8
GILD · Healthcare
70
#9
ROG.SW · Healthcare
63
#10
GSK.L · Healthcare
65
#11
ZM · Technology
68
#12
MMM · Industrials
59
Direct comparisons — MRK vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Healthcare rankings

See how Merck & Co., Inc. ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore MRK peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore MRK peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.