Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions

10 companies structurally similar to Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-08-16 · ML.PA full analysis →

Companies similar to Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in valuation. Examples in this group include Huhtamäki Oyj, Aalberts N.V., Heineken Holding N.V..

Reference company

ML.PA

Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions

Peer score: 55

Dimension scores

Growth

Quality

Valuation

Stability

Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score

#	Company	Peer score
#1	Huhtamäki Oyj HUH1V.HE · Consumer Cyclical	38	Analysis ML.PA vs HUH1V.HE
#2	Aalberts N.V. AALB.AS · Industrials	34	Analysis ML.PA vs AALB.AS
#3	Heineken Holding N.V. HEIO.AS · Consumer Defensive	70	Analysis ML.PA vs HEIO.AS
#4	Voestalpine AG VOE.VI · Basic Materials	59	Analysis ML.PA vs VOE.VI
#5	Nestlé S.A. NESN.SW · Consumer Defensive	39	Analysis ML.PA vs NESN.SW
#6	Heineken N.V. HEIA.AS · Consumer Defensive	63	Analysis ML.PA vs HEIA.AS
#7	Kemira Oyj KEMIRA.HE · Basic Materials	54	Analysis ML.PA vs KEMIRA.HE
#8	J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. JBHT · Industrials	61	Analysis ML.PA vs JBHT
#9	Jenoptik AG JEN.DE · Technology	49	Analysis ML.PA vs JEN.DE
#10	AB SKF (publ) SKF-B.ST · Industrials	48	Analysis ML.PA vs SKF-B.ST

Direct comparisons — ML.PA vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

ML.PA vs HUH1V.HE ML.PA vs AALB.AS ML.PA vs HEIO.AS ML.PA vs VOE.VI ML.PA vs NESN.SW ML.PA vs HEIA.AS ML.PA vs KEMIRA.HE ML.PA vs JBHT ML.PA vs JEN.DE ML.PA vs SKF-B.ST

Explore ML.PA peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore ML.PA peers →

ML.PA analysis ML.PA comparisons All companies Rankings

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.