Home Companies ALE.WA Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Allegro.eu S.A.

11 companies structurally similar to Allegro.eu S.A. (ALE.WA) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-06-14 · ALE.WA full analysis →

Companies similar to Allegro.eu S.A. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in growth. Examples in this group include LPP SA, Expedia Group, Inc., Deckers Outdoor Corporation.

Reference company
ALE.WA
Allegro.eu S.A.
Peer score: 65
Dimension scores
Growth
84
Quality
58
Valuation
66
Stability
55
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
LPP.WA · Consumer Cyclical
54
#2
EXPE · Consumer Cyclical
44
#3
DECK · Consumer Cyclical
60
#4
GAW.L · Consumer Cyclical
58
#5
NXT.L · Consumer Cyclical
58
#6
RL · Consumer Cyclical
60
#7
CMG · Consumer Cyclical
37
#8
ORLY · Consumer Cyclical
77
#9
ITX.MC · Consumer Cyclical
58
#10
BC.MI · Consumer Cyclical
38
#11
YUM · Consumer Cyclical
75
Direct comparisons — ALE.WA vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Consumer Cyclical rankings

See how Allegro.eu S.A. ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore ALE.WA peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore ALE.WA peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.