Wärtsilä Oyj Abp's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | WRT1V.HE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs Sulzer AG
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs Flowserve Corporation
|
46 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs Nordex SE
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs Crane Company
|
35 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs Donaldson Company, Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs IMI plc
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs KONE Oyj
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs Babcock International Group PLC
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs GE Vernova Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs ABB Ltd
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs APi Group Corporation
|
50 | Compare → |
|
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp vs ITT Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
View the complete Wärtsilä Oyj Abp report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.