Wolters Kluwer N.V.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | WKL.AS peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs RELX PLC
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Illinois Tool Works Inc.
|
69 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Graco Inc.
|
74 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Cintas Corporation
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Snap-on Incorporated
|
64 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Experian plc
|
64 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Hubbell Incorporated
|
54 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Intertek Group plc
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Pentair plc
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Geberit AG
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Applied Materials, Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Wolters Kluwer N.V. vs Schneider Electric S.E.
|
35 | Compare → |
View the complete Wolters Kluwer N.V. report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.