Home Compare WTW
Peer Analysis

Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare WTW with peers
Comparison WTW peer score
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Haleon plc
62 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Hannover Rück SE
59 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Swiss Re AG
49 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs PayPal Holdings, Inc.
49 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Tryg A/S
68 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
78 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Globe Life Inc.
52 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs The Kraft Heinz Company
46 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Trimble Inc.
31 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA
62 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Aflac Incorporated
54 Compare →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs The Travelers Companies, Inc.
66 Compare →

Full WTW analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.