Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | WTW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Haleon plc
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Hannover Rück SE
|
59 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Swiss Re AG
|
49 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs PayPal Holdings, Inc.
|
49 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Tryg A/S
|
68 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
|
78 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Globe Life Inc.
|
52 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs The Kraft Heinz Company
|
46 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Trimble Inc.
|
31 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs Aflac Incorporated
|
54 | Compare → |
|
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company vs The Travelers Companies, Inc.
|
66 | Compare → |
View the complete Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.