Home Compare WAB
Peer Analysis

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare WAB with peers
Comparison WAB peer score
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
52 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Diploma PLC
47 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Eaton Corporation plc
36 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Crane Company
50 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Trane Technologies plc
46 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Halma plc
49 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Ingersoll Rand Inc.
26 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Legrand SA
48 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Johnson Controls International plc
50 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Woodward, Inc.
57 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs ITT Inc.
36 Compare →
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Thales S.A.
67 Compare →

Full WAB analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.