VAT Group AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | VACN.SW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
VAT Group AG vs Teradyne, Inc.
|
39 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs QUALCOMM Incorporated
|
67 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Mueller Industries, Inc.
|
67 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Owens Corning
|
40 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
|
62 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
|
49 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Lam Research Corporation
|
56 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Graco Inc.
|
74 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Umicore SA
|
53 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Geberit AG
|
58 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Rockwell Automation, Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
VAT Group AG vs Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
33 | Compare → |
View the complete VAT Group AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.