Home Compare UMG.AS
Peer Analysis

Universal Music Group N.V. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Universal Music Group N.V.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare UMG.AS with peers
Comparison UMG.AS peer score
Universal Music Group N.V. vs The New York Times Company
52 Compare →
Universal Music Group N.V. vs Ströer SE & Co. KGaA
53 Compare →
Universal Music Group N.V. vs Demant A/S
41 Compare →
Universal Music Group N.V. vs DaVita Inc.
64 Compare →
Universal Music Group N.V. vs L'Oréal S.A.
46 Compare →
Universal Music Group N.V. vs Intertek Group plc
56 Compare →
Universal Music Group N.V. vs Accenture plc
66 Compare →
Universal Music Group N.V. vs Tenet Healthcare Corporation
51 Compare →

Full UMG.AS analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Universal Music Group N.V. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.