Traton SE's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | 8TRA.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Traton SE vs Iveco Group N.V.
|
33 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs Daimler Truck Holding AG
|
41 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs PACCAR Inc
|
44 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs Oshkosh Corporation
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs Deutsche Post AG
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs Valmet Oyj
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs Bouygues SA
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs Generac Holdings Inc.
|
15 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs Jungheinrich Aktiengesellschaft
|
55 | Compare → |
|
Traton SE vs KION GROUP AG
|
33 | Compare → |
View the complete Traton SE report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.