Thomson Reuters Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | TRI peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Union Pacific Corporation
|
67 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Constellation Brands, Inc.
|
41 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Copart, Inc.
|
63 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Lamar Advertising Company
|
67 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs CSX Corporation
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Equifax Inc.
|
40 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Verisk Analytics, Inc.
|
75 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs NXP Semiconductors N.V.
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs GSK plc
|
65 | Compare → |
View the complete Thomson Reuters Corporation report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.