The Weir Group PLC's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | WEIR.L peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Dover Corporation
|
48 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Schindler Holding AG
|
45 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Otis Worldwide Corporation
|
74 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs KONE Oyj
|
51 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Valmet Oyj
|
56 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Sulzer AG
|
56 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Rockwell Automation, Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Metso Oyj
|
47 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Donaldson Company, Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
The Weir Group PLC vs Rotork plc
|
56 | Compare → |
View the complete The Weir Group PLC report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.