Home Compare PG
Peer Analysis

The Procter & Gamble Company — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

The Procter & Gamble Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare PG with peers
Comparison PG peer score
The Procter & Gamble Company vs L'Oréal S.A.
38 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
72 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
48 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs Colgate-Palmolive Company
63 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs General Mills, Inc.
68 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs Kenvue Inc.
55 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs The J. M. Smucker Company
62 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs The Clorox Company
62 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated
54 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs Beiersdorf Aktiengesellschaft
51 Compare →
The Procter & Gamble Company vs Unilever PLC
69 Compare →

Full PG analysis in AssetNext

View the complete The Procter & Gamble Company report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.