The New York Times Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | NYT peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
The New York Times Company vs Universal Music Group N.V.
|
57 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs Trane Technologies plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
68 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
|
71 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs ABB Ltd
|
56 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs Allegion plc
|
60 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs Fox Corporation
|
65 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs Accenture plc
|
66 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs Eaton Corporation plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
The New York Times Company vs ITT Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
View the complete The New York Times Company report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.