The Charles Schwab Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | SCHW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs Morgan Stanley
|
58 | Compare → |
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
|
58 | Compare → |
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs Investec Group
|
54 | Compare → |
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs DNB Bank ASA
|
71 | Compare → |
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena S.p.A.
|
61 | Compare → |
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.
|
62 | Compare → |
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs Barclays PLC
|
54 | Compare → |
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation vs ING Groep N.V.
|
81 | Compare → |
View the complete The Charles Schwab Corporation report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.