The Boeing Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | BA peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
The Boeing Company vs DSV A/S
|
29 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs Barratt Redrow plc
|
49 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs Evercore Inc.
|
49 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs International Paper Company
|
54 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs Somnigroup International Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
35 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs MTU Aero Engines AG
|
61 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs Barry Callebaut AG
|
35 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs QXO, Inc.
|
46 | Compare → |
|
The Boeing Company vs 3i Group Ord
|
81 | Compare → |
View the complete The Boeing Company report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.