The structural profiles are close, with T-Mobile US carrying a narrow edge on valuation. Telia Company AB (publ) still leads on profitability and stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. In the market, Telia Company AB (publ) carries the stronger setup — intact trend against T-Mobile US's broken trend. That leaves a split case: the structural lead stays with T-Mobile US, but the market is not currently confirming it.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Peer scores are normalised within each company's primary universe (TELIA.ST: STOXX 600, TMUS: Nasdaq 100).
The comparison is mainly decided in valuation, with the rest of the profile carrying less weight.
Both operate in: Telecom Services
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. TELIA.ST and TMUS share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Telia Company AB (publ) and T-Mobile US each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
Pricing shapes this comparison more than a broad operating gap.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
Telia Company AB (publ) looks stronger, but the price setup still looks more supportive for T-Mobile US, Inc..
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
Where TELIA.ST and TMUS each sit in their own 5-year price and valuation history.
Describes historical entry positioning only. Descriptive — not investment advice.
The multiple-based pricing edge comes from a forward P/E that is 9.9 turns lower.
Telia Company AB (publ) still carries lower volatility exposure — that difference is real enough to prevent the comparison from becoming one-sided.
Valuation points more clearly to T-Mobile US, Inc., but stability and current pricing keep the broader result mixed.
Break down the TELIA.ST vs TMUS comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how TELIA.ST and TMUS each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.