Teledyne Technologies leads structurally, with stability as the clearest single gap between the two profiles. On the market side, Teledyne Technologies is in better shape — its trend is intact while Trimble's trend has broken down. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Teledyne Technologies's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Stability still does most of the heavy lifting in this comparison. The overall score gap is 11 points in favour of Teledyne Technologies Incorporated.
Both operate in: Scientific & Technical Instruments
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. TDY and TRMB share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Teledyne Technologies and Trimble each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The clearest separation appears in stability.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The setup stays mixed because structure and the price setup do not align cleanly in one direction.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
The clearest distance comes from a steadier profile over time.
Trimble Inc. still shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which keeps the wider picture mixed rather than completely one-sided.
Stability clearly separates the pair, while the broader read stays strong rather than one-way.
Break down the TDY vs TRMB comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how TDY and TRMB each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.