Home Compare FTI
Peer Analysis

TechnipFMC plc — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

TechnipFMC plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare FTI with peers
Comparison FTI peer score
TechnipFMC plc vs Subsea 7 S.A.
57 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Saipem SpA
43 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Crane Company
50 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Woodward, Inc.
57 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Diploma PLC
47 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Baker Hughes Company
67 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Penumbra, Inc.
38 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Flowserve Corporation
50 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs The New York Times Company
61 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Wärtsilä Oyj Abp
48 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs Pinterest, Inc.
30 Compare →
TechnipFMC plc vs EMCOR Group, Inc.
64 Compare →

Full FTI analysis in AssetNext

View the complete TechnipFMC plc report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.