Swissquote Group Holding SA's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | SQN.SW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs Morgan Stanley
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs TBC Bank Group PLC
|
50 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs BPER Banca SpA
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs Commerzbank AG
|
47 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
|
54 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs NatWest Group plc
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs KBC Group NV
|
50 | Compare → |
|
Swissquote Group Holding SA vs Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
|
60 | Compare → |
View the complete Swissquote Group Holding SA report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.