Swiss Prime Site holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across stability and growth. TAG Immobilien still has the edge on growth, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. On the market side, Swiss Prime Site is in better shape — its trend is intact while TAG Immobilien's trend has broken down. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Swiss Prime Site's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
The clearest separation starts in stability, with profitability adding a second layer of support. The overall score gap is 13 points in favour of Swiss Prime Site AG.
Both operate in: Real Estate - Diversified
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. SPSN.SW and TEG.DE share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Swiss Prime Site and TAG Immobilien each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The setup stays mixed because structure and the price setup do not align cleanly in one direction.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
The stability gap is very wide, with the stronger side looking materially steadier through time.
TAG Immobilien still pushes back on growth, with a 40-point revenue-growth advantage that keeps the read from becoming one-way.
The stability lead is clear, but pricing and growth still pull in the other direction — the result holds, but not without friction.
Break down the SPSN.SW vs TEG.DE comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how SPSN.SW and TEG.DE each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.