Home Compare SCA-B.ST
Peer Analysis

Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ)'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare SCA-B.ST with peers
Comparison SCA-B.ST peer score
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Enagás, S.A.
69 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Covivio
68 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
37 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Holmen AB (publ)
49 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Getlink SE
52 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Land Securities Group Plc
46 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield SE
66 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Equity Residential
52 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs UDR, Inc.
58 Compare →
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) vs Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
32 Compare →

Full SCA-B.ST analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.