Home Compare SYK
Peer Analysis

Stryker Corporation — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Stryker Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare SYK with peers
Comparison SYK peer score
Stryker Corporation vs Eaton Corporation plc
37 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs ResMed Inc.
60 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs STERIS plc
50 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
58 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
54 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs The Sage Group plc
62 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs Halma plc
49 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs Intuit Inc.
51 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs Autodesk, Inc.
69 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.
43 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs Lifco AB (publ)
44 Compare →
Stryker Corporation vs GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
62 Compare →

Full SYK analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Stryker Corporation report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.