Stora Enso Oyj's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | STERV.HE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs The Swatch Group AG
|
23 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Eni S.p.A.
|
40 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Wacker Chemie AG
|
25 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Kering SA
|
29 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Westlake Corporation
|
24 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs ArcelorMittal S.A.
|
59 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Arkema S.A.
|
13 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Mercedes-Benz Group AG
|
59 | Compare → |
|
Stora Enso Oyj vs Mondi plc
|
36 | Compare → |
View the complete Stora Enso Oyj report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.