SMA Solar Technology AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | S92.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs LANXESS Aktiengesellschaft
|
9 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Rubis
|
52 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs SalMar ASA
|
29 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Hera S.p.A.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
|
53 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs D'Ieteren Group SA
|
50 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Kontron AG
|
58 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Nagarro SE
|
61 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
|
20 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Syensqo SA/NV
|
39 | Compare → |
|
SMA Solar Technology AG vs Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
19 | Compare → |
View the complete SMA Solar Technology AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.