SIG Group AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | SIGN.SW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
SIG Group AG vs Volkswagen AG
|
61 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs General Motors Company
|
48 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
|
28 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs The Swatch Group AG
|
23 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Tesla, Inc.
|
37 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
|
9 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Burberry Group plc
|
24 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
|
65 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Mercedes-Benz Group AG
|
59 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Ford Motor Company
|
47 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Stora Enso Oyj
|
42 | Compare → |
|
SIG Group AG vs Stellantis N.V.
|
43 | Compare → |
View the complete SIG Group AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.