Service Corporation International's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | SCI peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Service Corporation International vs Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
|
54 | Compare → |
|
Service Corporation International vs Equity Residential
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Service Corporation International vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
|
39 | Compare → |
|
Service Corporation International vs Essex Property Trust, Inc.
|
53 | Compare → |
|
Service Corporation International vs Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
|
43 | Compare → |
|
Service Corporation International vs Invitation Homes Inc.
|
52 | Compare → |
|
Service Corporation International vs AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Service Corporation International vs The Cooper Companies, Inc.
|
53 | Compare → |
View the complete Service Corporation International report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.