Home Compare RR.L
Peer Analysis

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare RR.L with peers
Comparison RR.L peer score
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Howmet Aerospace Inc.
54 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Mycronic AB (publ)
60 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Vertiv Holdings Co
50 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Shopify Inc.
44 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Accelleron Industries AG
67 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
47 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Crane Company
46 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Penumbra, Inc.
36 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Carpenter Technology Corporation
51 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
34 Compare →
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs The Progressive Corporation
70 Compare →

Full RR.L analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Rolls-Royce Holdings plc report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.