Rio Tinto Group's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | RIO.L peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Rio Tinto Group vs Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs Airtel Africa Plc
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs Texas Instruments Incorporated
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs EOG Resources, Inc.
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs Ovintiv Inc.
|
45 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs Devon Energy Corporation
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs Koninklijke KPN N.V.
|
70 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs L'Air Liquide S.A.
|
67 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs CSX Corporation
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs Elisa Oyj
|
59 | Compare → |
|
Rio Tinto Group vs APA Corporation
|
60 | Compare → |
View the complete Rio Tinto Group report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.