Home Compare RGA
Peer Analysis

Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare RGA with peers
Comparison RGA peer score
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs AXA SA
51 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs CNA Financial Corporation
55 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Raymond James Financial, Inc.
75 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
61 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
61 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Stifel Financial Corp.
49 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Loews Corporation
51 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs MetLife, Inc.
46 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Synchrony Financial
67 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Aberdeen Group Plc
46 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs American Express Company
63 Compare →

Full RGA analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.