Home Compare RGA
Peer Analysis

Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare RGA with peers
Comparison RGA peer score
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs CNA Financial Corporation
53 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs AXA SA
65 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Raymond James Financial, Inc.
57 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
50 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
44 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Stifel Financial Corp.
39 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Loews Corporation
46 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs MetLife, Inc.
43 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs Synchrony Financial
63 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs American Express Company
49 Compare →
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
62 Compare →

Full RGA analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.