Home Compare RKT.L
Peer Analysis

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare RKT.L with peers
Comparison RKT.L peer score
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs Kenvue Inc.
55 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs The Procter & Gamble Company
66 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs Brown-Forman Corporation
46 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs General Mills, Inc.
68 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated
54 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs The J. M. Smucker Company
62 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
48 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs L'Oréal S.A.
38 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs Danone S.A.
46 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs Unilever PLC
69 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
56 Compare →
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs The Coca-Cola Company
66 Compare →

Full RKT.L analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Reckitt Benckiser Group plc report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.