Home Compare RRC
Peer Analysis

Range Resources Corporation — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Range Resources Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare RRC with peers
Comparison RRC peer score
Range Resources Corporation vs EQT Corporation
65 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs Coterra Energy Inc.
63 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs ConocoPhillips
55 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs Vår Energi ASA
73 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs Occidental Petroleum Corporation
31 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs Devon Energy Corporation
43 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
66 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs APA Corporation
58 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs EOG Resources, Inc.
72 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs Antero Resources Corporation
58 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs Anglo American plc
44 Compare →
Range Resources Corporation vs Sartorius Stedim Biotech S.A.
32 Compare →

Full RRC analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Range Resources Corporation report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.