Phillips 66's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | PSX peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Phillips 66 vs Valero Energy Corporation
|
45 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Marathon Petroleum Corporation
|
69 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs HF Sinclair Corporation
|
42 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Neste Oyj
|
7 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A.
|
69 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs DCC plc
|
29 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Exxon Mobil Corporation
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Halliburton Company
|
46 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Repsol, S.A.
|
54 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Phillips 66 vs Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
|
29 | Compare → |
View the complete Phillips 66 report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.