Home Compare PM
Peer Analysis

Philip Morris International Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Philip Morris International Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare PM with peers
Comparison PM peer score
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Altria Group, Inc.
79 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs The Coca-Cola Company
66 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Monster Beverage Corporation
60 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
64 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Paychex, Inc.
59 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Adobe Inc.
66 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Johnson & Johnson
58 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Rightmove plc
77 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Autotrader Group plc
59 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
50 Compare →
Philip Morris International Inc. vs Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
45 Compare →

Full PM analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Philip Morris International Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.