Partners Group Holding AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | PGHN.SW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs MSCI Inc.
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs Visa Inc.
|
74 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs Mastercard Incorporated
|
70 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs Moody's Corporation
|
63 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs Southern Copper Corporation
|
74 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs United Therapeutics Corporation
|
66 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs TransDigm Group Incorporated
|
59 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs Scout24 SE
|
71 | Compare → |
|
Partners Group Holding AG vs Corpay, Inc.
|
66 | Compare → |
View the complete Partners Group Holding AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.