Otis Worldwide Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | OTIS peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Donaldson Company, Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs KONE Oyj
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Rotork plc
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs IMI plc
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Schindler Holding AG
|
45 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Dover Corporation
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs The Weir Group PLC
|
42 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Bureau Veritas SA
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Sulzer AG
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs TopBuild Corp.
|
50 | Compare → |
View the complete Otis Worldwide Corporation report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.