OMV Aktiengesellschaft's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | OMV.VI peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Eni S.p.A.
|
53 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs TotalEnergies SE
|
78 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Croda International Plc
|
30 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Shell plc
|
71 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Endesa, S.A.
|
75 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Chevron Corporation
|
43 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs BP p.l.c.
|
60 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Repsol, S.A.
|
68 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Exxon Mobil Corporation
|
54 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Naturgy Energy Group, S.A.
|
67 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs Holcim AG
|
36 | Compare → |
|
OMV Aktiengesellschaft vs BKW AG
|
41 | Compare → |
View the complete OMV Aktiengesellschaft report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.