MTU Aero Engines AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | MTX.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs QXO, Inc.
|
46 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs Rheinmetall AG
|
39 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs InPost S.A.
|
11 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs Smurfit Westrock Plc
|
30 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs Amphenol Corporation
|
64 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs Somnigroup International Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs SUSS MicroTec SE
|
61 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
|
41 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs ONEOK, Inc.
|
59 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs Barry Callebaut AG
|
35 | Compare → |
|
MTU Aero Engines AG vs Celsius Holdings, Inc.
|
28 | Compare → |
View the complete MTU Aero Engines AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.