Home Compare MAA
Peer Analysis

Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare MAA with peers
Comparison MAA peer score
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs UDR, Inc.
59 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Equity Residential
52 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield SE
65 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Federal Realty Investment Trust
73 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
59 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Camden Property Trust
46 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane S.p.A.
42 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs PSP Swiss Property AG
59 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Invitation Homes Inc.
41 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Land Securities Group Plc
49 Compare →
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. vs Covivio
69 Compare →

Full MAA analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.