M&G plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | MNG.L peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
M&G plc vs Standard Life PLC
|
12 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs Quilter plc
|
71 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs Legal & General Group Plc
|
46 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs Aegon Ltd.
|
31 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs Bridgepoint Group plc
|
28 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs Capital One Financial Corporation
|
53 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs St. James's Place plc
|
62 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs The Charles Schwab Corporation
|
82 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs Schroders plc
|
58 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs SpareBank 1 Sør-Norge ASA
|
77 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs MetLife, Inc.
|
43 | Compare → |
|
M&G plc vs Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena S.p.A.
|
61 | Compare → |
View the complete M&G plc report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.