Home Compare MRSH
Peer Analysis

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare MRSH with peers
Comparison MRSH peer score
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Aon plc
66 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Sampo Oyj
78 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs PayPal Holdings, Inc.
49 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Stryker Corporation
61 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs SAP SE
51 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs AMETEK, Inc.
63 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs The Sage Group plc
59 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Bentley Systems, Incorporated
46 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Intuit Inc.
58 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Ingersoll Rand Inc.
38 Compare →
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs TeamViewer SE
50 Compare →

Full MRSH analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.