Home Compare MKS.L
Peer Analysis

Marks and Spencer Group plc — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Marks and Spencer Group plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare MKS.L with peers
Comparison MKS.L peer score
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs Chewy, Inc.
31 Compare →
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs Genuine Parts Company
21 Compare →
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
48 Compare →
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs The TJX Companies, Inc.
72 Compare →
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs Aptiv PLC
24 Compare →
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs Casey's General Stores, Inc.
53 Compare →
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs Tractor Supply Company
56 Compare →
Marks and Spencer Group plc vs Darden Restaurants, Inc.
53 Compare →

Full MKS.L analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Marks and Spencer Group plc report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.