Home Compare MTSI
Peer Analysis

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare MTSI with peers
Comparison MTSI peer score
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
28 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Arm Holdings plc
40 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs SUSS MicroTec SE
32 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation
46 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Somnigroup International Inc.
45 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
40 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Barry Callebaut AG
41 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs The Boeing Company
30 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Barratt Redrow plc
48 Compare →
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs QXO, Inc.
50 Compare →

Full MTSI analysis in AssetNext

View the complete MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.