Home Compare LAND.L
Peer Analysis

Land Securities Group Plc — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Land Securities Group Plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare LAND.L with peers
Comparison LAND.L peer score
Land Securities Group Plc vs Klépierre SA
74 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs Equity Residential
52 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs Essex Property Trust, Inc.
49 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs Invitation Homes Inc.
41 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs Warehouses De Pauw SA
48 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs SEGRO Plc
38 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
58 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs Simon Property Group, Inc.
74 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs PSP Swiss Property AG
59 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs MERLIN Properties SOCIMI, S.A.
72 Compare →
Land Securities Group Plc vs Aroundtown SA
55 Compare →

Full LAND.L analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Land Securities Group Plc report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.