Home Compare KNIN.SW
Peer Analysis

Kuehne + Nagel International AG — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Kuehne + Nagel International AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare KNIN.SW with peers
Comparison KNIN.SW peer score
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
78 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
65 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs Deutsche Post AG
63 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs Builders FirstSource, Inc.
26 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs United Parcel Service, Inc.
61 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs NIBE Industrier AB (publ)
39 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs Owens Corning
40 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs Georg Fischer AG
48 Compare →
Kuehne + Nagel International AG vs Daimler Truck Holding AG
44 Compare →

Full KNIN.SW analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Kuehne + Nagel International AG report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.