Konecranes holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across growth and valuation. Nordex SE still leads on growth and stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. The market setup is broadly comparable for both — no clear directional signal from price behavior. The market is not adding a decisive signal either way — the structural read carries the weight.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Growth points more clearly toward Nordex SE, even if the broader score still leans toward Konecranes Plc.
This pair is matched through long-term financial trajectory similarity within the selected peer universe.
This level of similarity signals a strong structural match, even though some dimensions still separate the two companies.
The clearest structural overlap shows up in investment intensity and recent revenue growth.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
Nordex SE is cheaper, but Konecranes Plc is still stronger.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
The main growth separation is very wide, driven by a meaningfully stronger expansion profile.
Konecranes Plc also shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which makes the lead look less detached from the underlying business picture.
The lead is built on both growth and valuation — though growth still provides a counterweight.
Break down the KCR.HE vs NDX1.DE comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how KCR.HE and NDX1.DE each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.