Home Compare KNX
Peer Analysis

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare KNX with peers
Comparison KNX peer score
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Southwest Airlines Co.
44 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Saia, Inc.
36 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Aalberts N.V.
36 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
39 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Mondi plc
49 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Wacker Chemie AG
30 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs General Motors Company
46 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
57 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Tesla, Inc.
42 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs United Internet AG
49 Compare →
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. vs Deutsche Lufthansa AG
63 Compare →

Full KNX analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.