Home Compare LATO-B.ST
Peer Analysis

Investment AB Latour (publ) — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Investment AB Latour (publ)'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare LATO-B.ST with peers
Comparison LATO-B.ST peer score
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
54 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Publicis Groupe S.A.
60 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Johnson Controls International plc
52 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Thales S.A.
69 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
55 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Honeywell International Inc.
51 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
42 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Emerson Electric Co.
46 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Lifco AB (publ)
38 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Veolia Environnement SA
63 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Ferrovial N.V.
56 Compare →
Investment AB Latour (publ) vs Ferrovial N.V.
37 Compare →

Full LATO-B.ST analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Investment AB Latour (publ) report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.